- Case note: Rb. 's-Gravenhage (The Netherlands: Darfurnica, Miffy and the right to parody! [case no. 389526 / KG ZA 11-294])
- Case date
- 4 May 2011
- Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law: 2190-3387
- Volume | Edition (Serie)
- 2011 | 3
- Document type
- Case note
- Faculty of Law (FdR)
- Institute for Information Law (IViR)
- Tevens noot bij: Hof Amsterdam (13-09-2011) (zaaknummer 200.054.943/01)
Page from: 236
Page to: 248
The legal community of the Netherlands let out a sigh of relief in May 2011 when the judgment of the District Court of The Hague in preliminary proceedings was handed down in the Darfurnica case.The same feeling of satisfaction prevailed, more recently, when the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam rendered decision in the Miffy case. Both decisions, rendered on appeal, overruled the judgments of first instance, which had given precedence to the protection of intellectual property rights above the user’s freedom of expression in the form of parody. But freedom of expression, and parody in particular, are solidly anchored in the Dutch values and courts more often than not find in favour of the parodist. Apart from the fact that both decisions offer an interesting analysis of where the limit lies between intellectual property protection and artistic freedom, each decision deserves a few words of commentary in view of some noteworthy particularities.
- Final publisher version
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.