Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning

Hooghe, L.; Bakker, R.; Brigevich, A.; de Vries, C.; Edwards, E.; Marks, G.; Rovny, J.; Steenbergen, M.; Vachudova, M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x

Author: L. Hooghe
R. Bakker
A. Brigevich
C. de Vries
E. Edwards
G. Marks
J. Rovny
M. Steenbergen
M. Vachudova
Year: 2010
Title: Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning
Journal: European Journal of Political Research
Volume | Issue number: 49 | 5
Pages (from-to): 687-703
Document type: Article
Faculty: Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
Institute: Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract: This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure national party positioning on European integration, ideology, and several European Union (EU) and non-EU policies. The reliability of expert judgments is examined and the CHES data are cross-validated with data from the Comparative Manifesto Project, the 2003 Benoit-Laver expert survey and the 2002 Rohrschneider-Whitefield survey. The dataset is available on the CHES website.
URL: go to publisher's site
Language: English
Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.338005

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.