- Evaluating direction-of-change forecasting: neurofuzzy models vs. neural networks
- Mathematical and Computer Modelling
- Volume | Issue number
- 46 | 1-2
- Pages (from-to)
- Number of pages
- Document type
- Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
- Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)
This paper investigates the nonlinear predictability of technical trading rules based on a recurrent neural network as well as a neurofuzzy model. The efficiency of the trading strategies was considered upon the prediction of the direction of the market in case of NASDAQ and NIKKEI returns. The sample extends over the period 2/8/1971-4/7/1998 while the sub-period 4/8/1998-2/5/2002 has been reserved for out-of-sample testing purposes. Our results suggest that, in absence of trading costs, the return of the proposed neurofuzzy model is consistently superior to that of the recurrent neural model as well as of the buy & hold strategy for bear markets. On the other hand, we found that the buy & hold strategy produces in general higher returns than neurofuzzy models or neural networks for bull periods. The proposed neurofuzzy model which outperforms the neural network predictor allows investors to earn significantly higher returns in bear markets.
- go to publisher's site
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.