- Experimental studies on the psychology of property rights
- Award date
- 3 February 2017
- Number of pages
- Document type
- PhD thesis
- Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
Property rights determine who owns what. Trade is very difficult if it is unclear who owns what or if property rights are not enforced. For this reason, many scholars argue that property rights and their enforcement are essential to economic prosperity. A distinction can be made between a legal and psychological approach to property rights. A legal approach to property rights considers how the rules of property rights are codified in law while a psychological approach focuses on how humans tend to think about property rights intuitively. The two approaches seem to diverge if more unconventional goods are considered. This thesis consists of four studies that investigate how consumers perceive unconventional goods in different contexts. The aim of these four studies combined is to gain a better understanding of consumers’ perception of property rights, which not only furthers relevant theories but also provides practical recommendations to policy-makers and managers.
Thesis (complete) (Embargo up to and including 3 February 2019)
2. The moral distinction between theft and piracy (Embargo up to and including 3 February 2019)
3. Theft and piracy: Incentivized experiments (Embargo up to and including 3 February 2019)
4. Dilution illusion (Embargo up to and including 3 February 2019)
5. Trading places (Embargo up to and including 3 February 2019)
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.