Competitive representative negotiations worsen intergroup relations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Representative negotiation affords a unique opportunity to regulate intergroup competition and conflict. Although past research
has identified factors that shape representative negotiations, little is known about how such interpersonal representative
negotiations influence broader intergroup relations. Here we investigate how the representative negotiation process can affect
intergroup relations, irrespective of negotiation outcomes. In Experiment 1, competitive (as opposed to cooperative or neutral)
communication by the outgroup representative decreased satisfaction with the outcome and increased outgroup derogation. In
Experiment 2, the timing of the competitive behavior of the outgroup representative was shown to affect ensuing intergroup
relations, such that early rather than late competition led to higher outcome satisfaction because of reduced outcome expectations,
but also decreased trust in and perceived closeness of the outgroup. Together, these findings show that competitive behavior,
especially early rather than late in the representative negotiation process increases outcome satisfaction, but hurts intergroup
relations, regardless of the actual negotiation outcome.
go to publisher's site
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let
the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible
and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
You will be contacted as soon as possible.