- Kant's logic revisited
- The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications
- Volume | Issue number
- 4 | 4
- Pages (from-to)
- Number of pages
- Document type
- Interfacultary Research Institutes
Amsterdam University College (AUC)
- Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Kant considers his Critique of Pure Reason to be founded on the act of judging and the different forms of judgement, hence, take pride of place in his argumentation. The consensus view is that this aspect of the Critique of Pure Reason is a failure because Kant’s logic is far too weak to bear such a weight. Here we show that the consensus view is mistaken and that Kant’s logic should be identified with geometric logic, a fragment of intuitionistic logic of great foundational significance.
- Final publisher version
- In: Special issue dedicated to the memory of Grigory Mints
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.