- Surveillance as public matter
- Revisiting sousveillance through devices and leaks
- Award date
- 8 February 2018
- Number of pages
- Document type
- PhD thesis
- Faculty of Humanities (FGw)
- Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Our conceptual understanding of surveillance is continuously challenged by digital innovations. Projects that render (digital) surveillance visible and knowable become interesting analytic starting points. Since surveillance consists of technical and often secret processes, this ‘rendering visible’ inevitably requires a form of translation. This translation process is the main concern of this dissertation: How is surveillance made public? That question is tackled by combining an empirical inquiry on how surveillance is traced, made visible and understandable with a conceptual search for new vocabularies to address surveillance practices and countermeasures.
This thesis presents four case studies into four so-called ‘sousveillance’ projects: two counter-tracking devices for mobile phones and web browsing (InformaCam and Ghostery), and two leaks of surveillance repositories (WikiLeaks and the NSA disclosures). Inspired by Actor Network Theory (ANT), these projects are analysed through the notion of the socio-technical ‘device’ with a sensitivity to the materiality of publics. Specific focus is placed on the instruments through which surveillance is brought to the fore, the transformations that take place, the importance of the different settings, and the kinds of publics these configurations (could) enact.
The analysis, combining Surveillance Studies and ANT, shows that sousveillance has a contextually embedded, and publicly relevant, research dimension. In short, in tackling surveillance, the projects turn surveillance into a public resource for re-appropriation, into ‘public matter’. The conclusion outlines a research agenda into ‘surveillance publics’, publics that combine privacy practices with making things public. Lastly, the dissertation calls for more collaboration between academics and technical surveillance experts.
Thesis (complete) (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
1: Tackling internet surveillance (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
2: Devices for making surveillance public (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
3: A forensic device for activism: How activists use metadata tracking for the production of public proof (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
4: Transparency devices and leaked data: Sites for radical expertise? (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
5: Turning a safety tool into a microscope: Tracking the trackers (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
6: Leaky apps and data shots: Technologies of leakage and insertion in NSA surveillance (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
7: Conclusion: The materiality of surveillance made public (Embargo up to and including 8 February 2020)
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.