- Empiricist solutions to nativist puzzles
- 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2009), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Book/source title
- Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Pages (from-to)
- Cognitive Science Society
- Document type
- Conference contribution
- Interfacultary Research Institutes
- Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
How much knowledge of language is innate and how much is learned through experience? The nativist view endorses that human language acquisition is guided by innate rules ("Universal Grammar"), while the empiricist view assumes that language acquisition is the product of abstractions from stored exemplars. Despite the apparent opposition between these views, the essence of the debate lies in the relative contribution of prior knowledge and linguistic experience. The main goal is then to establish the minimal prior knowledge needed for language acquisition to take place. In this paper we will focus on a couple of hard linguistic phenomena that have for a long time been considered "parade cases of an innate constraint": auxiliary fronting and binding. We show that these linguistic facets can be learned without assuming specific constraints or principles and without presuming that they have been literally seen in the data. Instead, we will demonstrate that these phenomena can be learned either from simpler sentences in a corpus of child-directed speech or emerge from a specific parsing strategy.
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.