- Teaching towards historical expertise
- Developing students’ ability to reason causally in history
- Award date
- 14 November 2017
- Number of pages
- Document type
- PhD thesis
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
- Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)
Explaining historical events is an important goal in history education, but not much is known about pedagogical approaches to support this reasoning. In this dissertation, we therefore developed and investigated a learning-environment intended to foster students’ ability for causal historical reasoning. Based on the model of domain learning and the framework of historical reasoning, we defined causal historical reasoning as a construct consisting of (knowledge of) second-order concepts, causal strategies and epistemological beliefs.
In the first study, we designed a lesson-unit on the First World War and conducted a quasi-experimental study with 11th-grade preuniversity students. In a second study, we replicated the experiment in a randomized controlled design. We concluded that explicit teaching constituted an indispensable principle in developing causal historical reasoning. Students in the experimental (explicit) condition showed greater improvement on the knowledge of causal strategies and second-order concepts. Furthermore, these students reported learning-gains related to epistemological aspects of causal explanations. At post-test in the experimental condition, a strong correlation was found between epistemological beliefs and students’ interest.
Applying knowledge of causal historical reasoning in a document-based writing-task remained difficult for students. A qualitative study showed that students were able to integrate aspects of causal historical reasoning in their texts, but that they struggled with the argumentative nature of the task. Throughout the studies, epistemological beliefs surfaced as an important dimension of students’ historical reasoning, but assessing these beliefs was complex. Therefore, in the final study, we developed a new questionnaire aimed at evaluating naïve and nuanced epistemological beliefs.
- Chapter 3: Copyright © 2017 by American Psychology Association (“APA”). Reproduced with permission. Stoel, G.L., van Drie, J.P., & van Boxtel, C.A.M. (2017). The effects of explicit teaching of strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students’ ability to reason causally in history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 321-337, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000143
Thesis (complete) (Embargo up to and including 14 November 2019)
Chapter 4: Working on too many levels? An exploration of students’ explanatory writing in history (Embargo up to and including 14 November 2019)
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.