The goal of this phonological investigation is to establish whether the primary prosodic feature in Low German dialects is
tone, quantity, or something else entirely. All in all, we find that Low German employs a combination of vowel quality and
vowel quantity, which carries functional load. It is a binary phonological system accounting for the ternary vowel duration
found in Low German. I point out a crucial distinction between fortis vs. lenis consonants by means of laryngeal specification
vs. underspecification and, hence, structural complexity of the segments. It is this complexity opposition in the coda consonants,
which has a profound impact on the vowel duration of a preceding nucleus. We arrive at a phonological surface opposition of
monomoraic vs. bimoraic and lax vs. tense in the vowel system, and of laryngeally specified vs. unspecified in the consonant
system. Underlyingly, no quantity contrast exists in Low German, all vowels being simply monomoraic. What remains is quality.
With the data and analyses presented in this thesis, Low German falls in the category of languages featuring three phonetic
degrees of vowel length that can be traced back to a binary contrast at the surface level. No ternary quantity system is required.
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let
the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible
and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
You will be contacted as soon as possible.