- M.W. Hesselink
- Unfair terms in contracts between businesses
- Book/source title
- Towards a European contract law
- Publication Year
- 131 - 147
- München; Sellier European law publishers
- Document type
- book chapter
- Faculty of Law
This paper examines the main possible rationales for judicial control of unfair contract terms (unequal bargaining, distributive justice, market failure, paternalism, the ethos of the market, comparative law, and the nature of an optional instrument) and concludes that none of them requires a distinction, in this respect, between business to consumer (B2C) and business to business (B2B) contracts. Unfair terms review in B2B contracts, under the same unfairness test as in B2C, is compatible with any plausible rationale for such a review and is even required by several of them.
- go to publisher's site
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the University Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint the University Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please send an e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org, or a letter to: Bibliotheek van de Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. Electronic Services, UvA-DARE, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.