The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).
faculty: "FGw" and publication year: "2009"
| Authors||E. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis|
|Title||The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation: approaches from legal theory and argumentation theory|
|Journal||Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric|
|Faculty||Faculty of Humanities|
|Institute/dept.||FGw: Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)|
|Abstract||In the past thirty years legal argumentation has become an important interdisciplinary field of interest. The study of legal argumentation draws its data, assumptions and methods from disciplines such as legal theory, legal philosophy, logic, argumentation theory, rhetoric, linguistics, literary theory, philosophy, sociology, and artificial intelligence. Researchers with different backgrounds and from various traditions are attempting to explain structural features of legal decision-making and justification from different points of view.
The authors describe how argumentation theorists, philosophers, legal theorists, and legal philosophers deal with these problems from different points of view. The authors distinguish three traditions in the study of legal argumentation: the logical, the rhetorical and the dialogical approach. Ideas about the analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation, developed by influential authors in the field, are examined. The contribution is concluded with a more extensive discussion of the pragma-dialectical approach to legal argumentation that integrates rhetorical and dialectical aspects of legal argumentation.|
Use this url to link to this page: http://dare.uva.nl/en/record/336276
Contact us about this recordNotify a colleague
Add to bookbag