The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).

Search results

Query: faculty: "FdR" and publication year: "2012"

AuthorC. Angelopoulos
TitleThe myth of European term harmonisation: 27 public domains for the 27 Member States
JournalIIC: International review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law
Volume43
Year2012
Issue5
Pages567-594
ISSN00189855
FacultyFaculty of Law
Institute/dept.FdR: Instituut voor Informatierecht (IViR)
AbstractThe term of protection of copyright and related rights is generally considered to be one of the best harmonised areas of European copyright law. However, close examination of the EU Term Directive's intricate provisions reveals a piecemeal and permissive approach to harmonisation which preserves many differences between the national rules of EU Member States. In this report, four main sources of legislative variability in the term of protection in Europe are identified and analysed: (a) contagion from unharmonised areas of substantive copyright law; (b) explicit exceptions to the harmonisation of the term of protection; (c) national related rights of unharmonised term; and (d) incorrect implementation of the provisions of the Term Directive into national law.
As a result, the desired harmonising effect has not been fully achieved: although a single rule may be applicable across the EU in theory, drastically divergent terms of protection may attach to the same information product depending on the jurisdiction within which protection is sought. In this way, the territorial nature of copyright undercuts harmonisation efforts, forcing the European public domain to contract and expand according to divergent national rules. The result is a legislative framework that makes cross-border rights clearance calculation difficult, hampering end-users and cultural heritage organisations from taking full avail of the new opportunities now technically available for the digitisation and exploitation of the public domain. If the EU wishes to establish a truly harmonised term of protection for copyright and related rights, a more committed and comprehensive approach will be a necessary.
Document typeArticle
Download
Document finderUvA-Linker