The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).

Zoekresultaten

Zoekopdracht: faculteit: "FdR" en publicatiejaar: "2007"

AuteurJ. De Deken
TitelDistribution of responsibility for social security and labour market policy. - Country report: Belgium
UitgeverAmsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies, University of Amsterdam
PlaatsAmsterdam
Jaar2007
Pagina's104
SerietitelAIAS working paper
Serienummer07/53
FaculteitFaculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen
Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid
Instituut/afd.FMG: Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
FdR: Amsterdams Instituut voor ArbeidsStudies (AIAS)
SamenvattingHigh levels of unemployment, or high levels of social expenditures as well as the growing demand for a flexible labour force have given new impetus to the world-wide discussion on what model to use for an efficiently operating labour market and in particular on the role of institutions. Although there seems to be a growing consensus on the restricted governmental role in recent decades, this has not been translated into a unanimous appraisal of the role of intermediary organisations, such as trade unions. There is no clear view on an appropriate distribution of responsibility between government, social partners and the market. The research project ‘distribution of responsibility for social security’ aims to create a scientific basis for a clear and consistent view on the role and distribution of responsibilities between the different labour market institutions. As part of this research project, this paper provides an elaborate country study of the Netherlands, on the organisation of unemployment insurance, employment protection and active labour market and the performance of the labour market with respect to these fields. Both first-order effects (e.g. coverage rates, expenditures, replacement rates) and second-order effects (e.g. flows in and out of unemployment insurance) are analysed in this paper.


It is shown that the role of trade unions in the Belgian unemployment insurance system is quite different from what one would expect in a ‘Ghent system’. It is not the union but the state who determines the conditions of the insurance policy and both actors together are responsible for the administration. When considering the demand side, there clearly is an element of choice in the Belgian model of unemployment insurance since the employee can choose his payment body (union or state fund). Employment protection has been rather stable in Belgium and an important role is played by a redundancy payment fund that guarantees temporary unemployment benefits on top of the normal unemployment insurance benefits. As for active labour market policies, a complex web of distributions is found in Belgium: the regional authorities are responsible for the job finding or retraining of the unemployed, the federal government monitor and sanction the unemployed, the unions operate as a kind of ‘brokers’ helping their members to find their way in this myriad of institutions and making sure that their rights are not infringed upon. Because these functionally differentiated institutions are controlled by a governance structure composed of representatives of the very same collective actors, there may be operating a kind of network structure which, in addition to the formal coordination structures that have been set up, allows for an additional exchange of information.
Soort documentRapport
Document finderUvA-Linker