The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).

Zoekresultaten

Zoekopdracht: faculteit: "FGw" en publicatiejaar: "2010"

AuteurB. Amjarso
TitelMentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument: a conceptual and empirical study of the persuasiveness of a mode of strategic manoeuvring
PromotorF.H. van Eemeren
Co-promotorsE.T. Feteris, H.L.M. Meuffels
Datum16-12-2010
UitgeverSicSat
PlaatsAmsterdam
Jaar2010
Pagina's132
FaculteitFaculteit der Geesteswetenschappen
Trefwoordenstrategisch manoeuvreren; overtuigingskracht; tegenargumenten; pragma-dialectiek
SamenvattingIn the context of a critical discussion the arguer bases his choice of arguments on the type of critical reactions that the other party has put forward with regard to the arguer’s standpoint. In the context of a monologue, however, the arguer should determine in advance whether to simply mention supporting arguments or, in addition to doing so, mention and refute possible counterarguments. The aim of this study is to examine theoretically and empirically which of these two options is more persuasive. Relying on the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic manoeuvring, it is argued that mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument is more persuasive than mentioning only supporting arguments. This theoretical claim is tested empirically. Results have shown that ordinary arguers find argumentative messages in which, in addition to a supporting argument, a counterargument is mentioned and then refuted more persuasive than messages in which only supporting arguments are mentioned.
TaalEnglish
Soort documentProefschrift
Download bestanden
Document finderUvA-Linker