The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).

Zoekresultaten

Zoekopdracht: faculteit: "ACTA" en publicatiejaar: "2009"

AuteursC.P. Saridin, P.G.H.M. Raijmakers, S. Al Shamma, D.B. Tuinzing, A.G. Becking
TitelComparison of different analytical methods used for analyzing SPECT scans of patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity
TijdschriftInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Jaargang38
Jaar2009
Nummer9
Pagina's942-946
ISSN09015027
FaculteitACTA
SamenvattingThis study aimed to compare different analytical methods and identify the optimal analysis method to distinguish patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH) from those with inactive condyles. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of patients with progressive and nonprogressive mandibular asymmetry (each group, n = 26), were analyzed using the region of interest technique. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the different analytic methods. The ROC curve illustrates that UCH can be diagnosed significantly better by determining the percentile bone activity in both condyles. The area under the curve (AUC) of the percentile comparison between the affected and contralateral condyles was 0.93 ± 0.04, that for the condyle/clivus ratio was 0.75 ± 0.07 and for the condyle/cervical spine (CS) ratio 0.57 ± 0.08. Sensitivity for the condyle/clivus ratio was 65% and specificity 61%. Sensitivity for the condyle/CS ratio was 85% and specificity 31%. For the percentile difference of the condyles, sensitivity and specificity were 88%. For UCH patients, direct comparison of bone activity between the affected and contralateral condyle in SPECT scans is the analysis method of choice. Comparison of condylar bone activity to reference bone activity does not have additional value in the diagnosis of UCH.
Soort documentArtikel
Document finderUvA-Linker