The UvA-LINKER will give you a range of other options to find the full text of a publication (including a direct link to the full-text if it is located on another database on the internet).
De UvA-LINKER biedt mogelijkheden om een publicatie elders te vinden (inclusief een directe link naar de publicatie online als deze beschikbaar is in een database op het internet).

Search results

Query: faculty: "FEB" and publication year: "2011"

AuthorsS. Cahan, W. Zhang, D. Veenman
TitleDid the waste management audit failures signal lower firm-wide audit quality at Arthur Andersen?
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
Volume28
Year2011
Issue3
Pages859-891
ISSN08239150
FacultyFaculty of Economics and Business
Institute/dept.FEB: Amsterdam Business School Research Institute (ABS-RI)
AbstractThis study investigates Arthur Andersen’s audit quality in the decade before the collapse of Enron. Andersen’s involvement in the Waste Management audit failures — which relate to audits of the company’s 1992– 1996 financial statements — led the SEC to accuse Andersen of issuing false and misleading audit reports and resulted in a permanent injunction that prohibited Andersen from further violation of securities laws. We examine whether the Waste Management audit failures were symptomatic of widespread audit deficiencies at Andersen. Using three empirical measures of audit quality — discretionary accruals, clients’ propensity to meet or just beat analyst forecasts, and accounting misconduct identified by Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases (AAERs) — we find no overall evidence suggesting lower average audit quality at Andersen relative to the Big 4 during the period 1992–2001 for a sample of S&P 1500 firms. Focusing on high litigation risk firms, however, we find larger absolute and income-increasing accruals and a greater propensity to meet or just beat analyst forecasts for Andersen clients relative to the Big 4 clients in the period August 7, 2000 to December 31, 2001, after Andersen’s divorce from Andersen Consulting. These findings provide some evidence that, after the divorce, Andersen was not able to constrain aggressive accounting where it may have mattered most, that is, among its clients with the highest litigation risk.
Document typeArticle
Document finderUvA-Linker